Research Themes for 2009/2010

The CTKC will review and fund requests for applied research projects relating to the outlined themes. Projects should fall under at least one of the following four theme areas:

  1. Client Self-Care Strategies and Programs

    In Canada, there has been a growing focus on self-care over the last few decades, with a particular emphasis on the role of the individual client in health care.1 While self-care strategies can be used to promote health and prevent illness, there has been increasing attention on their use to manage chronic health conditions, which are the greatest single cause of death, disability, and illness in Canada.2,3,4 As the number of adults over age 60 is expected to rise substantially and the prevalence of chronic disease increases with age,5,6 research focused on maintaining health and managing chronic illness through self-care strategies has become increasingly critical to improve system efficiencies and to better support health clients.

    Self-care refers to all clients do to promote health, prevent illness, and manage all aspects of living with a chronic health condition, including symptoms, treatment, physical and social consequences, and lifestyle changes.7,8 Health care providers can also support self-care by taking a client-centred, "collaborative approach to care that promotes [client] activation, education and empowerment".9 Self-care strategies and programs can empower clients to enhance their health, monitor their illnesses, and make the necessary cognitive, behavioural, and emotional changes to maintain a satisfactory quality of life.7 Clients take responsibility for treatment adherence10 and living well with illness and health events by questioning the direction of their health care, making choices about every aspect of the care they receive, and ensuring treatment suits their lifestyles and is in line with their goals and priorities.11,12,13

    Those suffering from a chronic illness or recuperating from another health event, such as an injury, may employ a number of self-care strategies to cope with their condition. Some may have been suggested to clients by health care professionals on an informal basis, as part of their regular care, while others may simply be undertaken by clients without any direction from their care providers. These might include lifestyle modifications, treatment adherence and/or seeking support from social networks or support groups.14,15,16 Clients may also participate in more formal illness self-management programs that may be facilitated by either health care professionals or consumer-led groups. Self-management programs often focus on consumer empowerment and may teach specific self-care skills and behaviours, techniques to cope with symptoms, appropriate use of medication, nutrition, and/or communication and social skills. Clients may also be supported through the provision of disease-specific education and other resources to assist with self-care and navigating through the health care system.17,16,18

    Past research has demonstrated that self-care practices can be effective in enabling clients to minimize pain, improve quality of life, enhance elements of health status, and reduce utilization of medical services.11,19,20,16,17,21 Self-care can also be a means of containing costs22 and increasing the sustainability of the health care system, as it can reduce hospitalizations, emergency department use, visits to medical doctors, and overall managed care costs.7,19,20,16,11

    With an increasing prevalence of chronic illness in the population,2 which places a huge burden on the health care system,23 and a shift towards client self-care and health promotion, we feel it is vital to continue the development and evaluation of these practices, with a particular focus on the client experience of self-care and the partnership between clients and health care providers. This will provide a better understanding of client priorities and goals, reasons for treatment non-compliance or alteration, the nature of client/provider interactions, and ways to assist clients as they navigate through the health care system.

    Proposals related to Client Self-Care Strategies and Programs may focus on one of the following areas and should include client input and perceptions wherever possible:

    • Promotion of client and family empowerment, autonomy, and decision-making capacity with regards to clients` health care through the use of self-care strategies and programs
    • Examination of the types of self-care and health promotion strategies and programs in which clients and families engage (e.g. lifestyle modifications, seeking support from social networks, peer support programs, formal self-management programs)
    • Effectiveness of these strategies and programs (outcomes could relate to health status, self-management behaviours, self-efficacy, health care utilization, cost effectiveness, client and family satisfaction, or disease-specific measures)
    • Availability, appropriateness, and/or effectiveness of supports and resources for self-care or to assist clients and families in navigating through the health care system
    • Factors affecting treatment adherence and/or engagement with health care professionals from a client and family perspective and the clinical outcomes associated with this adherence24
    • Barriers/challenges to successful self-management of illnesses, health promotion and disease prevention, as they relate to self-care programs and strategies
    • Effectiveness of assessment tools designed to measure client and family empowerment or client and family perceptions of self-care strategies
  2. Information Communication Technology

    Technology is playing a growing role in the way in which health care partnerships are created and maintained. It is possible to enhance client and caregiver collaboration through the use of information communication technology, as it increases the availability of clinical information, encourages the use of decision support tools, and allows for communication and practice across distances. Computer technology can aid health care providers in meeting clients` expectations for services that are readily available, accessible, and seamlessly coordinated. In addition, it provides alternative ways for health information and services to be delivered directly to clients in their home, such as through the use of the internet25 or telephone-delivered interventions.26

    Information communication technology can also be related directly to self-care, assisting home care clients to continue to live independently at home and increasing their confidence in their ability to self-manage their conditions. This may be accomplished through the provision of information, allowing them to more actively participate in care planning, and telehomecare strategies.27 For example, technologies/equipment in the home can allow client self-monitoring and transmission of health data (e.g. blood pressure, cardiorespiratory signals), which would provide progress indicators to health care professionals without the need for recurrent home visits or visits to the doctor`s office or hospital.28,29,30,27 Technology, such as home dialysis, can provide some clients with the ability to treat their illness at home, rather than requiring frequent clinic visits.12 Self-care may also be supported through the use of computer programs to assist with client preference assessment and "decision aids" that help clients think carefully about complex health issues, understand and clarify values, treatment and screening options, and likely outcomes.31,13

    While it is important to understand the transformative impact of technology as a positive influence, it is also crucial to explore client perspectives on information communication technology, its desirability, and its congruence with their lives and understanding of their illness.32,33 It is essential to assess how technology modifies client expectations, client/care provider interactions, and the actions that each may take, as well as the actual effect the technology has on health and wellness.33 We should not just to assume that technology is beneficial and will be welcomed by clients and health care providers alike. For example, the use of technology assumes computer literacy, which may be a barrier to some users.27 Technology may also be perceived as having a negative impact on the client/provider relationship, as it may reduce the need for face-to-face communication, which may be an important part of their care to some clients.

    Through the ACT Research Grants Program, we aim to promote an approach that incorporates consultation with clients and care providers during the design phase of new technology, as opposed to only following implementation. This will allow for an assessment of needs and interest, taking into account the fact that technology may be perceived as desirable by some groups (e.g. designers) and not others (e.g. clients).33 We encourage the investigation of initiatives that combine technology with other types of communication and include one-to-one interaction.

    Proposals related to Information Communication Technology may focus on one of the following areas and should include client input and perceptions wherever possible:

    • Promotion and support of client and family empowerment, autonomy, and decision-making capacity with regards to clients` health care through the use of information communication technology
    • Development and evaluation of a client and family decision aid or preference assessment tool for health-related treatment or screening decisions; tools to aid clinicians in interpreting the elicited client preference data
    • Effectiveness of technologies for client self-monitoring and transmission of health data or home treatments
    • Alternative ways of delivering tailored health information and services directly to clients and families in their home (e.g. use of the internet, use of electronic health records, telephone-delivered interventions), including effectiveness of these methods
    • Examination of the impact of health technologies on client/provider interactions and the nature of their relationship; the role of technology in facilitating or hindering collaboration Promotion and support of consumer empowerment, autonomy, and decision-making capacity with regards to clients` health care through the use of information communication technology
    • Development and evaluation of a client decision aid or preference assessment tool for health-related treatment or screening decisions; tools to aid clinicians in interpreting the elicited client preference data
    • Effectiveness of technologies for client self-monitoring and transmission of health data or home treatments
    • Alternative ways of delivering tailored health information and services directly to clients in their home (e.g. use of the internet, use of electronic health records, telephone-delivered interventions), including effectiveness of these methods
    • Examination of the impact of health technologies on client/provider interactions and the nature of their relationship; the role of technology in facilitating or hindering collaboration Promotion and support of consumer empowerment, autonomy, and decision-making capacity with regards to clients` health care through the use of information communication technology
  3. System Approaches to Client-Centered Care

    Client-centred care involves the manner in which care is organized and delivered with a focus on client empowerment and respect for his/her autonomy, needs, concerns, values, and priorities. Ideally, at an individual level, clients are viewed as whole persons, not diagnoses, and are leaders in their healthcare. Clients decide if and who will participate in their care, defining the goals that shape the practices of the health care team. Evidence has shown that, at an individual level, client-centred care has been effective in increasing client satisfaction and improving the quality of care.34,35 There are many efforts to create and deliver client-centred care in partnership with health providers across Canada and internationally. One strong example of this commitment is the Registered Nurses` Association of Ontario`s Best Practice Guideline on Client Centred Care.34

    In order to continue to improve care and impact clients in a positive way at the point of care, it is important to evolve individual organizational models of client-centred care to a system-wide, collaborative approach. Such a shift in focus would involve efforts across delivery sites, policy and professional designations. It would be a complex undertaking that would require significant input from clients, caregivers, health care providers, governments, and stakeholders to identify and investigate new models, procedures, and policies to ensure that an integrated team approach to health care is achieved. However, it is this type of approach, one that is open to an exploration of new ways to integrate, communicate, transition, partner and to create unique models that honour the experience of clients that may have the most potential to transform the client experience of health care. The Care to Know Centre is interested in projects that will advance efforts and provide effective strategies relating to evidence-informed policy, procedures, and practices that will promote the adoption of client-centered approaches across the health system. Projects must involve investigations of strategies and practices between two or more organizations, examining the interrelationship of key stakeholders, and should involve the client and/or their network of family and informal care givers.

    Proposals related to System Approaches to Client-Centred Care may focus on one of the following areas and should include client input and perceptions wherever possible:

    • System approaches to client and family-centred care, including models, policies and delivery practices
    • Factors that inhibit or promote collaboration and client and family-centred care across organizations (e.g. roles, responsibilities, attributes, attitudes, expectations, and needs)
    • Appropriateness and/or effectiveness of current models of client-centred care delivery, practice, and policy.
  4. Informal Caregiver Support Programs and Services

    With an aging population and a growing number of clients being cared for in the community, informal caregivers are playing an increasingly vital role in caring for clients in their homes. Informal caregivers are most often “unpaid individual family members who aid in patients’ physical care and disease process coping”.36 They can be seen as providing three main types of social support to their loved one: informational, instrumental (such as driving patient to doctor’s appointments and preparing meals) and emotional.36 In terms of prevention and health promotion, the family is also important in encouraging healthy behaviors.36

    Given the significant role caregivers play in the client’s care, it is important for health care providers to understand the concerns and needs of caregivers in order to provide as much support as possible, which is likely, in turn, to improve patient care. This can be accomplished through on-going collaboration and effective communication between formal and informal caregivers.

    While caring for a family member can be a rewarding experience, caregivers often also experience many negative emotions such as burden, stress and worry.37 Caring for someone with a chronic disability has been shown to have significant effects on the caregiver’s health, particularly their psychological health.38Caregivers may struggle with role changes, feelings of losing control, a sense of inadequacy in providing care, guilt, denial, anger, fear and anxiety.37 Dealing with emotional or behavioural problems with the client has also been shown to consistently increase caregiver distress and/or burden.39

    Research points to fact that interactions between caregivers and formal providers have often failed to properly prepare and support caregivers for their care provider role.40,41 Health care professionals may not fully recognize the complexity of work carried out by caregivers and may not acknowledge them as integral members of the care team.  In some cases, health care providers may focus solely on the needs of their clients and may not see it as part of their job to attend to the needs of the patient’s informal caregivers.36,40 If caregivers' needs or concerns are overlooked, they will be ill-prepared to provide care for the client.

    Research has indicated several key areas in which caregivers may need support from providers or other resources. Specific caregiver requirements will depend on individual characteristics and the unique caregiving situation, however there are some common needs that can be anticipated. For example, caregivers will likely have many learning requirements, such as a general need for health-related information so that they can provide adequate and appropriate support and care to the patient and be involved in decision-making.36 Some specific types of information that may be needed is information about the disease, delivery of home care, medications and side effects, depression, health promotion, community resources and financial resources.37,39,42 Caregivers also wish to be informed of the client’s condition. This type of information can reduce the caregiver’s distress and increase control and informed decision-making, thus making the caregiving experience more rewarding and the care they can provide more effective.39,42

    In addition to learning needs, a systematic review of the literature demonstrated that caregivers have a need for opportunities to get out more themselves and for respite care.37 They also reported a need for assistance with running errands, shopping and cooking and a desire for more stimulation for their relative.37

    Given the different forms of many diseases, the various treatment options, the changing nature of the information, as well as the unique characteristics of the caregiver, client and health team, more dynamic approaches to caregiver support are needed.

    Proposals related to Caregiver Support Programs and Services may focus on one of the following areas and should include client and/or caregiver input and perceptions wherever possible:

    • The development of programs, resources and strategies that promote caregiver empowerment, autonomy, and decision-making capacity with regards to clients’ health care and family supports
    • The development of programs, resources and strategies that promote enhanced communication between formal and informal caregivers and/or facilitate formal care providers’ understanding of caregivers needs
    • The development and/or evaluation of peer support or volunteer supporting interventions that support caregivers including, for example, online social networks and face to face support groups
    • Effectiveness of strategies and programs to support caregivers with a focus on outcomes including health status of client, health status of caregiver, client and caregiver satisfaction or experience measures and stress reduction)
    • Availability, appropriateness, and/or effectiveness of supports and resources for caregivers in navigating through the health care system and their role in it
    • Programs that investigate and/or address factors affecting family and client centred care engagement with health care providers from a caregiver perspective
    • Programs that support the training and delivery of family and client centred health care
    • Policy investigations and recommendations to address the needs of caregivers
    • Best practice guidelines and recommendations for providers working with family caregivers
    • Effectiveness of virtual technology to close information deficit experienced by informal caregivers (including timely access to appropriate information)
    • The investigation/evaluation of the need for or benefit of respite programs for caregivers and key program elements.  
  5. View References
    1. Health Canada (1997). Supporting Self-Care: The Contributions of Nurses and Physicians. (Cat. No. H39-401/1997E). Ottawa: Health Canada Publications.
    2. World Health Organization (2005). Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment. Facing the Facts: The Impact Of Chronic Disease In Canada. Retrieved September 26, 2008 from http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/media/canada.pdf
    3. Ontario Health Promotion E-Bulletin (2006). Integrating Self-Care and Chronic Disease Management through a Community Based Research Approach. Retrieved September 18, 2008 from http://www.ohpe.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7747&Itemid=78
    4. Haydon E, Roerecke M, Giesbrecht N, Rehm J, Kobus-Matthews M (2006). Chronic Disease in Ontario and Canada: Determinants, Risk Factors and Prevention Priorities. Prepared for the Ontario Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance and the Ontario Public Health Association.
    5. Statistics Canada (2007). A Portrait of Seniors. Retrieved September 26, 2008 from http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/070227/d070227b.htm
    6. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A (2001). Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into Action. Health Affairs, 20(6), 64-78.
    7. Coleman MT & Newton KS (2005). Supporting Self-management in Patients with Chronic Illness. American Family Physician, 72(8), 1503-1510.
    8. Alliance for Self Care Research (n.d.). About Self Care. Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http://www.ascr.ac.uk/selfcare.htm
    9. Quoted in Jones M, MacGillivary S, Kroll T, Zohoor A (2006). How is Self-Care Defined in the Literature. Presentation to the Social Dimensions of Health Institute Conference May 3-5, 2006 "Enhancing Self Care."
    10. Sajatovic M, Davies M, Bauer M, McBride L, Hays R, Safavi R, Jenkins J (2005). Attitudes regarding the collaborative practice model and treatment adherence among individuals with bipolar disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46(4), 272 - 277.
    11. Kralik D, Koch T, Price K, Howard N (2004). Chronic illness self-management: taking action to create order. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 259-267.
    12. Polaschek, N (2006). Managing home dialysis: the client perspective on independent treatment. Renal Society of Australasia Journal, November 1, 2006.
    13. Ottawa Health Research Institute. (n.d.). Patient Decision Aids. Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http://www.ohri.ca/DecisionAid/
    14. Grohar-Murray ME, Becker A, Reilly S, Ricci M (1998). Self-care actions to manage fatigue among myasthenia gravis patients. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 30(3), 191-199.
    15. Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K (2006). Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illness, 2(3), 185-194.
    16. Corrigan PW (2002). Illness Self-Management Strategies: A guideline developed for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management project. Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http://www.bhrm.org/guidelines/mhguidelines.htm
    17. Stanford Patient Education Research Center (2008). Stanford Self-Management Programs. Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/programs/
    18. Foster G, Taylor SJC, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ (2007). Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005108. DOI: 10.102/14651858.CD005108.pub2
    19. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, et al. (2001). Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Medical Care, 39, 1217-1223.
    20. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Holman HR (1999). Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Medical Care, 37(1), 5-14.
    21. Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC (1998). Long-term outcomes of an arthritis self-management programme. British Journal of Rheumatology, 37(12), 1315-1319.
    22. Fisher DB (1996). Self managed care: the most effective-managed care. Journal of the California Alliance for the Mentally Ill, 7(1), 26.
    23. Canadian Nurses Association (2005). Chronic Disease and Nursing: A Summary of the Issues, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved September 26, 2008 from www.cna-aiic.ca
    24. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X (2008). Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000011. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3
    25. Strohecker, J (1999). Healthworld Online: Promoting healthy living via self-managed care. Total Health, 21(5), 35-37.
    26. Badger T, Segrin C, Dorros SM, Meek P, Lopez AM (2007). Depression and anxiety in women with breast cancer and their partners. Nursing Research, 56(1), 44-53.
    27. Canadian Home Care Association (2008). Integration through Information Communication Technology for Home Care in Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
    28. Pinna GD, Maestri R, Andrews D, Witkowski T, Capomolla S, Scanferlato JL et al. (2007). Home telemonitoring of vital signs and cardiorespiratory signals in heart failure patients: system architecture and feasibility of the HHH model. International Journal of Cardiology, 120(3), 371-379.
    29. Halifax NV, Cafazzo JA, Irvine MJ, Hamill M, Rizo CA, McIssac WJ, Rossos PG, Logan AG (2007). Telemanagement of hypertension: A qualitative assessment of patient and physician preferences. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 23(7), 591-594.
    30. Logan AG, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, Irvine MJ, Saunders A, Dunai A, Rizo CA, Feig DS, Hamill M, Trudel M, & Cafazzo JA (2007). Mobile phone-based remote patient monitoring system for management of hypertension in diabetic patients. American Journal of Hypertension, 20(9), 942-948.
    31. Brennan PF, Strombom I (1998). Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(3), 257 - 262.
    32. Finch T (2008). Teledermatology for chronic disease management: coherence and normalization. Chronic Illness, 4(2), 127-34.
    33. Lehoux P (2008). Why Examining the Desirability of Health Technology Matters. Healthcare Policy, 3(3), 29-39.
    34. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2006). Client Centred Care. (rev. suppl.) Toronto, Canada: Registered Nurses` Association of Ontario.
    35. Health Canada (2000). Quest for Quality in Canadian Health Care: Continuous Quality Improvement, 2nd edition. Health Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved October 10, 2008 from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/qual/2000-qual/fund-fond-eng.php
    36. Bevan, J.L., & Pecchioni, L.L. (2008). Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes.  Patient Education and Counseling, 71(3), 356-364.
    37. Stoltz, P., Udén, G., & Willman, A. (2004). Support for family carers who care for an elderly person at home – a systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(2), 111-119.
    38. Simon, C., Kumar, S., & Kendrick, T. (2008). Formal support of stroke survivors and their informal carers in the community: a cohort study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16(6), 582-592.
    39. Morrison, V. (1999). Predictors of carer distress following stroke. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 9(3), 265-271.
    40. Weinberg, D.B., Lusenhop, R.W., Gittell, J.H., & Kautz, C.M. (2007). Coordination between formal providers and informal caregivers. Health Care Management Review, 32(2), 140-149.
    41. Nolan, M. (2001). Working with family carers: towards a partnership approach. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 11(1), 91-97.
    42. Hardwick, C., & Lawson, N. (1995). The information and learning needs of the caregiving family of the adult patient with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 4(3), 118-121.

For more information on the above themes, please click on Theme title.

Download ACT Grants Theme Guidelines